literature

50 Reasons why SJWs Suck

Deviation Actions

Aristodes's avatar
By
Published:
13.9K Views

Literature Text

1. They oppose freedom of speech. When someone says something they don't like, they call it "hate speech."
2. They cannot stand ideas which contradict them, which is why they hide in "safe spaces."
3. They label their opponents "bigots", no matter what the actual views of their opponents are.
4. They try to turn colleges into their home, trying to close their minds rather than open them.
5. They wish to infantilize universities by placing "trigger warnings" or outright banning material which they disapprove of, such as Greek mythology.
6. They claim to speak for everyone who isn't white, male, or straight.
7. They claim that any minorities or women who disagree with them are suffering from "internalized misogyny" or other form of self-hatred.
8. They cannot back up their claims with facts.
9. They push for censorship of information they do not like, as their claims cannot stand up to scrutiny.
10. They consider consensus more important than the truth. In other words, if a lot of SJWs agree with a statement, they will defend it, even if the facts prove it false.
11. They have banned comedians from many college campuses.
12. They care more about video games than actual harm committed against women and minorities.
13. They seek to ban journalists who might shed light on their misdeeds (just look up Melissa Click and the student journalist).
14. They form into mobs and launch loud protests in which they declare themselves to be victims, even when little or nothing has occurred.
15. They claim to be victims in spite of generally being better off than the general population.
16. They vastly overreact to any criticism of their policies.
17. They have gotten university presidents fired for doing nothing wrong.
18. They make lists of demands on universities for ridiculous reasons, then invade campus offices and go on hunger strikes when they don't get their way.
19. They have been caught lying about incidents at colleges just to get money and/or attention.
20. They judge people based on skin color and gender.
21. They think that women and minorities cannot be biased against men and white people, respectively.
22. They think that they have the right to redefine terms. Seriously, they think that racism and sexism is "bias plus power", and that minorities and women lack power so they "cannot be sexist."
23. They take offense to perfectly innocuous statements. That sort of thing is called a dog whistle.
24. They think sensitivity enables them to suppress the truth.
25. They never reflect on the rightness of their actions or even consider the possibility that they are wrong.
26. They demand that journalists declare loyalty to their cause. Really. Google it if you don't believe me. Seriously, they think neutrality is an attack on them.
27. They are narcissistic, petty, vengeful, loud, bossy, shrill, and see the world in black-and-white terms. That last one is both literal and metaphoric.
28. They very rarely if ever take responsibility when something goes wrong, blaming "the system" instead.
29. They would consider the same treatment they show to others as oppression, but are blind to their blatant hypocrisy.
30. They rarely know what actual struggle and hardship are like, so they are hypersensitive when anything gets in their way.
31. They have terrible taste in video games, preferring Gone Home over Fallout 4. Yeah, this one is somewhat subjective, but Fallout 4 is widely held to be a very good game.
32. They segregate themselves by race and gender by kicking out whites and men from their groups.  
33. They compare their imagined oppression to persecution which minorities suffer from at the hands of ISIS.
34. They want attention all of the time, even getting upset when media focus on the Paris attacks took them out of the spotlight for a week or so.
35. They have a tremendous sense of entitlement despite denouncing entitlement.
36. They think that science fiction has a duty to support their far-left viewpoints. Just look at the Sad Puppies campaign and the PC madness it had to fight.
37. When SJWs get into the media, they collude and repeat the same phrases over and over in hopes of smothering dissent. Just look at the "Gamers are Dead" articles.
38. For all of their rhetoric against hatred, they are clearly haters themselves. They hate anyone who dares speak against them.
39. They construct bogus strawman arguments when attempting to address legitimate criticism.
40. They have attacked people who support racial equality, even going so far as to attack US presidential candidates who they feel don't go far enough. Seriously, they have hijacked political rallies before, forcing their way onto the stage and shouting at anyone who protests this.
41. They have been known to attack religious people simply for their faith.
42. They have even attacked older feminists for not agreeing with them.
43. They are the most intolerant people around, despite their demands for tolerance. They want tolerance for themselves, but will not tolerate anyone else.
44. They have demanded money for doing very little work, and have sometimes even received tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars for almost no effort. Just look at Feminist Frequency. It's a scam on an epic level.
45. They say some crazy nonsense. Just do a quick Google search. Arthur Chu's "mindkill" rant is a good place to start. And "nonsense" is a nice way of saying it.
46. They believe that victims automatically possess moral superiority. This is why they try so hard to paint themselves as victims. Weaponizing victimhood. Truly, it is hard to get any lower than that.
47. They want to censor the internet because they don't like what they see there. This is like some of the earlier points, I know.
48. They take advantage of good impulses in people (such as the desire not to be racist) and twist them to achieve their own ends. Like a scam artist who pretends to be blind to get donations. Or a privileged white woman who claims to be a victim in order to get money in exchange for producing low-quality videos in which she rants about video games.
49. They get the facts wrong most of the time when they explain just about anything.
50. Ultimately, they suck because they are liars who want to take away other people's rights.

Bonus: They compare gamers to terrorists.
Even if you don't agree with these, you can't prove that these are wrong.

Think I'm mis-characterizing them? Just read this: www.thecrimson.com/column/the-red-line/article/2014/2/18/academic-freedom-justice/

And watch this. Please. www.youtube.com/watch?v=qAAeVU…
© 2015 - 2024 Aristodes
Comments319
Join the community to add your comment. Already a deviant? Log In
Tanooki-John's avatar

This looks very accurate.