Shop Mobile More Submit  Join Login
1. They oppose freedom of speech. When someone says something they don't like, they call it "hate speech."
2. They cannot stand ideas which contradict them, which is why they hide in "safe spaces."
3. They label their opponents "bigots", no matter what the actual views of their opponents are.
4. They try to turn colleges into their home, trying to close their minds rather than open them.
5. They wish to infantilize universities by placing "trigger warnings" or outright banning material which they disapprove of, such as Greek mythology.
6. They claim to speak for everyone who isn't white, male, or straight.
7. They claim that any minorities or women who disagree with them are suffering from "internalized misogyny" or other form of self-hatred.
8. They cannot back up their claims with facts.
9. They push for censorship of information they do not like, as their claims cannot stand up to scrutiny.
10. They consider consensus more important than the truth. In other words, if a lot of SJWs agree with a statement, they will defend it, even if the facts prove it false.
11. They have banned comedians from many college campuses.
12. They care more about video games than actual harm committed against women and minorities.
13. They seek to ban journalists who might shed light on their misdeeds (just look up Melissa Click and the student journalist).
14. They form into mobs and launch loud protests in which they declare themselves to be victims, even when little or nothing has occurred.
15. They claim to be victims in spite of generally being better off than the general population.
16. They vastly overreact to any criticism of their policies.
17. They have gotten university presidents fired for doing nothing wrong.
18. They make lists of demands on universities for ridiculous reasons, then invade campus offices and go on hunger strikes when they don't get their way.
19. They have been caught lying about incidents at colleges just to get money and/or attention.
20. They judge people based on skin color and gender.
21. They think that women and minorities cannot be biased against men and white people, respectively.
22. They think that they have the right to redefine terms. Seriously, they think that racism and sexism is "bias plus power", and that minorities and women lack power so they "cannot be sexist."
23. They take offense to perfectly innocuous statements. That sort of thing is called a dog whistle.
24. They think sensitivity enables them to suppress the truth.
25. They never reflect on the rightness of their actions or even consider the possibility that they are wrong.
26. They demand that journalists declare loyalty to their cause. Really. Google it if you don't believe me. Seriously, they think neutrality is an attack on them.
27. They are narcissistic, petty, vengeful, loud, bossy, shrill, and see the world in black-and-white terms. That last one is both literal and metaphoric.
28. They very rarely if ever take responsibility when something goes wrong, blaming "the system" instead.
29. They would consider the same treatment they show to others as oppression, but are blind to their blatant hypocrisy.
30. They rarely know what actual struggle and hardship are like, so they are hypersensitive when anything gets in their way.
31. They have terrible taste in video games, preferring Gone Home over Fallout 4. Yeah, this one is somewhat subjective, but Fallout 4 is widely held to be a very good game.
32. They segregate themselves by race and gender by kicking out whites and men from their groups.  
33. They compare their imagined oppression to persecution which minorities suffer from at the hands of ISIS.
34. They want attention all of the time, even getting upset when media focus on the Paris attacks took them out of the spotlight for a week or so.
35. They have a tremendous sense of entitlement despite denouncing entitlement.
36. They think that science fiction has a duty to support their far-left viewpoints. Just look at the Sad Puppies campaign and the PC madness it had to fight.
37. When SJWs get into the media, they collude and repeat the same phrases over and over in hopes of smothering dissent. Just look at the "Gamers are Dead" articles.
38. For all of their rhetoric against hatred, they are clearly haters themselves. They hate anyone who dares speak against them.
39. They construct bogus strawman arguments when attempting to address legitimate criticism.
40. They have attacked people who support racial equality, even going so far as to attack US presidential candidates who they feel don't go far enough. Seriously, they have hijacked political rallies before, forcing their way onto the stage and shouting at anyone who protests this.
41. They have been known to attack religious people simply for their faith.
42. They have even attacked older feminists for not agreeing with them.
43. They are the most intolerant people around, despite their demands for tolerance. They want tolerance for themselves, but will not tolerate anyone else.
44. They have demanded money for doing very little work, and have sometimes even received tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars for almost no effort. Just look at Feminist Frequency. It's a scam on an epic level.
45. They say some crazy nonsense. Just do a quick Google search. Arthur Chu's "mindkill" rant is a good place to start. And "nonsense" is a nice way of saying it.
46. They believe that victims automatically possess moral superiority. This is why they try so hard to paint themselves as victims. Weaponizing victimhood. Truly, it is hard to get any lower than that.
47. They want to censor the internet because they don't like what they see there. This is like some of the earlier points, I know.
48. They take advantage of good impulses in people (such as the desire not to be racist) and twist them to achieve their own ends. Like a scam artist who pretends to be blind to get donations. Or a privileged white woman who claims to be a victim in order to get money in exchange for producing low-quality videos in which she rants about video games.
49. They get the facts wrong most of the time when they explain just about anything.
50. Ultimately, they suck because they are liars who want to take away other people's rights.

Bonus: They compare gamers to terrorists.
Even if you don't agree with these, you can't prove that these are wrong.

Think I'm mis-characterizing them? Just read this: www.thecrimson.com/column/the-red-line/article/2014/2/18/academic-freedom-justice/

And watch this. Please. www.youtube.com/watch?v=qAAeVU…
Add a Comment:
 
:iconjohan-88:
johan-88 Featured By Owner Dec 23, 2016
Their habits its like tenants.
Reply
:iconnorthstars4ever:
NorthStars4ever Featured By Owner Dec 5, 2016  Hobbyist Writer
quick question: I am Tamil Indian, baptized a Catholic and I have conservative beliefs. I do not like Black Lives Matter (they do not care about my rights), and I do not like the feminist agenda (the whole lot of them are a bunch of low-self esteems who feel they need a voice :/ ). So, how would an SJW feel about me? XD
Reply
:iconaristodes:
Aristodes Featured By Owner Dec 5, 2016  Hobbyist Digital Artist
They would probably label you a traitor or declare that you have "internalized bigotry" or some nonsense like that.
Reply
:iconnorthstars4ever:
NorthStars4ever Featured By Owner Dec 5, 2016  Hobbyist Writer
That's a title I will willingly accept! I would rather be responsible and smart then to be stupid and a "victim" like them.

Besides, good guys are boring! So are bad guys! Traitors are awesome! XD
Reply
:iconaristodes:
Aristodes Featured By Owner Dec 5, 2016  Hobbyist Digital Artist
As much as I'd never thought I'd say it, that's the spirit! :D
Reply
:iconvoid696:
Void696 Featured By Owner Nov 25, 2016
Great list! Totally describes the majority of SJWs. Mind it if I add it to my anti SJW group?
Reply
:iconaristodes:
Aristodes Featured By Owner Nov 25, 2016  Hobbyist Digital Artist
Already accepted now. Thanks for offering to host it there!
Reply
:iconvoid696:
Void696 Featured By Owner Nov 25, 2016
Of course. Feel free to join if you like. It's harder to find stuff like you wrote than you think.

Either way, thanks for the submission.
Reply
:iconaristodes:
Aristodes Featured By Owner Nov 25, 2016  Hobbyist Digital Artist
You are welcome.
Reply
:iconandrewrocha:
Andrewrocha Featured By Owner Nov 23, 2016  Hobbyist General Artist
no wonder why other countries are laughing at us
Reply
:iconaristodes:
Aristodes Featured By Owner Nov 23, 2016  Hobbyist Digital Artist
SJWs have infested other Western countries as well.
Reply
:iconnoukamouthegreat:
NoukamouTheGreat Featured By Owner Jan 31, 2017  Student General Artist
Atleast we called two Exterminators, Trump and Milo.
Reply
:iconandrewrocha:
Andrewrocha Featured By Owner Nov 23, 2016  Hobbyist General Artist
yup
Reply
:iconmrgreen36:
Mrgreen36 Featured By Owner Oct 16, 2016  Hobbyist Writer
If number 5 is true, they'd shit themselves reading Viking mythology.

At any rate, the worst part about these feminist social justice warriors is that they've got the backing of the world's media and half the celebrity world. If anyone dares call them out on their bullshit or even voices an argument on how they're wrong, they claim that the patriachy is trying to oppress them and all the major news outlets back them and the celebrity world instantly starts whining on twitter to support them.

For example, I personally believe that most of the so called harassment that Anita Sarkeesian and others received was mostly people making well researched points as to why they were wrong. 

Of course because being a feminist is "cool" and being a gamer makes you a fat neckbeard still living in your parents basement, the media and celebrities instantly side with them, mostly to make themselves look better and win free points.

The whole thing can best be summoned up by a quote from Malcolm X

"If you're not careful, the media will have you hating the oppressed and loving the oppressors" 
Reply
:iconaristodes:
Aristodes Featured By Owner Oct 16, 2016  Hobbyist Digital Artist
You said it all very well. Only thing is, no one thinks being a feminist is cool outside of the SJW circles and the mainstream media. Feminism is now correctly equated with man-hating, cult behavior, extreme left-wing views, and (to an extent) freakish lifestyles often practiced by unattractive women and incredibly lame men who are desperate to impress certain types of women by any means.
Reply
:iconmrgreen36:
Mrgreen36 Featured By Owner Oct 16, 2016  Hobbyist Writer
Well I consider myself fairly left wing and yet I ain't gonna consider myself a feminist anytime soon
Reply
:iconaristodes:
Aristodes Featured By Owner Oct 16, 2016  Hobbyist Digital Artist
At this point, the leftists probably consider you a moderate. A few years later, they'll call you a conservative. Then a Nazi.
Reply
:iconmrgreen36:
Mrgreen36 Featured By Owner Oct 16, 2016  Hobbyist Writer
As much as I want to disagree with you, I have a horrible feeling you're right
Reply
:iconaristodes:
Aristodes Featured By Owner Oct 16, 2016  Hobbyist Digital Artist
The phrase "all lives matter" is being branded by the far left as right-wing and/or racist. A couple of years ago, it was harmless. Back in the 1990s, it was considered progressive, and in the 1960s, it might have been seen as left-wing and radical.
Reply
:iconcosmosandchaos:
If I saw a SJW before me, I'd actually fear for my life. Seriously.
Reply
:icondragonking24:
DragonKing24 Featured By Owner Sep 30, 2016
Do SJW also hate Catholics?
Reply
:iconaristodes:
Aristodes Featured By Owner Sep 30, 2016  Hobbyist Digital Artist
Often, they do. They certainly hate what the church teaches. As a Catholic, they don't like my pro-life views, for starters.
Reply
:icondragonking24:
DragonKing24 Featured By Owner Sep 30, 2016
Oh God! So they would hate me too?! And what if I'm a white who is Hispanic descent or they care?
Reply
:iconaristodes:
Aristodes Featured By Owner Sep 30, 2016  Hobbyist Digital Artist
They hate white people on principle. Including themselves. Most SJWs are white.
Reply
:icongriswaldterrastone:
GriswaldTerrastone Featured By Owner Sep 28, 2016
As someone who has been on this world for half a century now, I've seen how it can go well beyond what you post here.

Baby Boomers are usually portrayed as ultra-liberal hippies in the mainstream media, largely because of the 1960s. But there is a glaring problem here: if my generation- Generation X- was both much smaller and too young to vote in 1980, and the Baby Boomers are so numerous, AND former President Jimmy Carter did pardon draft dodgers, how did Ronald Reagan become President both in 1980 and 1984?

Obviously the Baby Boomers must have put him there.

Ronald Reagan's victory was in part due to the recession (hah hah) going on in the late 1970s- although this was not Carter's fault (we had just finished the expensive Vietnam War, there had been the oil embargo, etc. before 1976), but it was mostly a reaction to the extreme liberalism of the 1960s and 1970s. By today's standards such "liberalism" seems mild, but back then it was considered pretty extreme.

SJWs are a far more extreme breed, so one can only wonder just what sort of reaction there will be to them. I shudder to think that Stormfront may gain power because of them...but it is quite possible.

I've said for some time that Hillary Clinton may lose not because of "sexism" or because people actually like Donald Trump, but because feminists have made too many enemies over the decades. Can you imagine anyone in that fraternity from the University of Virginia ever voting for her after what feminism and SJWs put them through? They would just be the latest bunch of enemies made. It has really added up.

What's more, SJWs are by their very nature self-destructive. They live to squabble and complain. So let's say they get all the "privileged white cis-males" off the campuses- then what? The SJW males themselves, no matter how much they may try to "white knight," will be the next to go; the problem with the notion of "The Progressive Stack" is that if the ones at the very top are knocked off the thing then the ones right under them must end up in the crosshairs.


When I turned 18 back in 1984 I had two realistic choices for President: Mondale and Reagan. This year those turning 18 have...Hillary and Trump. I'm not just saying this: to you young new voters, you have my sympathies. I just hope in 2020 you'll have real choices.
Reply
:iconaristodes:
Aristodes Featured By Owner Sep 29, 2016  Hobbyist Digital Artist
Reagan was the only choice in 1984. The only plausible one, at least. He won almost every state.
Reply
:icongriswaldterrastone:
GriswaldTerrastone Featured By Owner Oct 1, 2016
No, Mondale was a respectable alternative. But his chances were ruined by what we now call the "politically correct." But your statement does amplify my point: could Reagan have won so if not for overwhelming Baby Boomer support? No- even if every member of my smaller generation of voting age had voted for Mondale...Reagan would have won by a landslide. So the idea of "most Baby Boomers are leftist hippies" in reality cannot be true, in spite of what mainstream medias say.

One problem someone like Hillary Clinton has- aside from what I've already said- is the failure of "progressives" to distance themselves from things like the Rolling Stone rape hoax and SJW behavior. Reagan would have done so with Stormfront, and likely if asked even Trump would- but would Hillary ever say "the Rolling Stone hoax and campus witch hunt was wrong, especially the resulting violence?"

Trust me, I've seen too much of this by now. The crummy choices we have this year did not happen overnight, but has been long in the making. And Generation X and younger generations are left with the resulting wreckage. I don't know how old you are, but if I could take you back to 1980 you'd cry just at how easy work was to come by and how much less interference (Obamacare the corporation's best friend, speech codes, etc.) there was. You could literally quit your job and be working somewhere else the next day. I'm sorry for kids just starting out today.
Reply
:iconoctoink20:
OctoInk20 Featured By Owner Aug 11, 2016  Hobbyist General Artist
Social Justice Warriors?

MORE LIKE SOCIAL JEWSTICE TERRORISTS.
Reply
:iconguardmn:
guardmn Featured By Owner Aug 5, 2016
SJWs are a bunch of animals.
Reply
:iconunlucky-requiems:
Unlucky-Requiems Featured By Owner Jul 20, 2016  Student
I think the "warrior" part sounds to badass for this hypocritical group...

They should rename it "worrier"......sorry that was bad 
Reply
:iconshark235:
shark235 Featured By Owner Jul 6, 2016  Hobbyist General Artist
Aka the social justice whiners. :D
Reply
:iconmjnseifer:
MJNSEIFER Featured By Owner Jun 24, 2016
51.  They make it harder for writers to do almost anything, without being accused of being an SJW (e.g. a female gets a strong heroic role, in a movie, and it just has to mean the movie has an SJW agenda, and it can't possibly mean the writer simply wanted a character like that).

Yes, it's the extreme anti-SJWs who do this, but maybe there wouldn't be so many of them if SJWs didn't act the way they did.
Reply
:iconlilynettte:
lilynettte Featured By Owner Jun 1, 2016
a few of them made Steven Universe, tho. And that's pretty good, isn't it?
Reply
:icongraeystone:
Graeystone Featured By Owner Jun 13, 2016
Actually if Steven was SJW, he'd be a spoiled brat who would never be punished for doing some wrong(he can't watch TV for the next 1000 years doing something wrong). . .also Greg(Steven's dad) is NOT a complete incompetent, loser father. He runs his own business and is shown to openly care for Steven. Its practically the complete opposite of how SJWs see Fatherhood.
Reply
:iconlilynettte:
lilynettte Featured By Owner Jun 16, 2016
i love this response. Thank you for making me laugh ^u^ ~<3
Reply
:icongraeystone:
Graeystone Featured By Owner Jun 17, 2016
Welcome. The most frightening things about SJWs is that they want the US to be like it is in Fahrenheit 451 where anything 'Offensive' literally gets burned to ashes.
Reply
:icondarklord-g:
DARKLORD-G Featured By Owner Mar 19, 2016
garbage
Reply
:iconaristodes:
Aristodes Featured By Owner Mar 19, 2016  Hobbyist Digital Artist
Care to explain?
Reply
:icondarklord-g:
DARKLORD-G Featured By Owner Mar 19, 2016
too lazy
Reply
:iconaristodes:
Aristodes Featured By Owner Mar 19, 2016  Hobbyist Digital Artist
What would you have me do, then? It's a list, not an essay.
Reply
:icontenshi3d:
Tenshi3D Featured By Owner Mar 8, 2016
I compare the SJWs to the Daleks from Doctor Who. Their behavior resembles that of a Dalek. When they throw their fits, all I think is "Exterminate! Exterminate!"
Reply
:icongraeystone:
Graeystone Featured By Owner Jun 13, 2016
Or the Firemen from Fahrenheit 451 which would more realistic and frightening. 
Reply
:iconkyrtuck:
kyrtuck Featured By Owner Feb 17, 2016  Hobbyist General Artist
Except Anti-SJWs become as bad or worse all the damn time.
Reply
:iconguei-girl:
Guei-Girl Featured By Owner Mar 15, 2016  Student General Artist
Do you hate being a man or something? Because I notice you do some male bashing and you happen to be male. Odd isn't it?
Reply
:iconkyrtuck:
kyrtuck Featured By Owner Mar 16, 2016  Hobbyist General Artist
Okay, so to answer your question: no, I don't hatre men, I'm just seeing things the way they are.  Phoolan Devi got gang raped several times by bandits and cops.  Are there any men who got gang raped by all female bandits and cops? 

In Tuesdays with Morrie, I heard of a man who raped his newborn baby daughter.  Has there been any moms raping their newborn son?  How would that eevn be physically possibl;e?

Everyone complains about non white immigrant men raping white women, I never hear about non white immigrant women rapuing white men.

There's 40 year old men marrying 12 year old girls, where's the 40 year old women marrying 12 year old boys?

Men get raped in prison...by other men!  I've never heard of male prisoners getting raped by female prisoners.

Face it, men have got history, society and biology stacked up against them.


Yet still, no, I don't hate men, since most of the makers of books, games, films, shows, comics, and youtube channels I like are male.  And most of my friends on DA and IRL are male. 

Male hating would clearly be stupid and self destructive.
Reply
:iconkyrtuck:
kyrtuck Featured By Owner Mar 15, 2016  Hobbyist General Artist
Yeah, just like MRAs calling men they don't like "manginas" huh?
Reply
:iconguei-girl:
Guei-Girl Featured By Owner Mar 15, 2016  Student General Artist
Both sides are wrong. MRAs and man haters are both assholes who need to get help.
Reply
:iconshernod9704:
Shernod9704 Featured By Owner Jan 18, 2016
But there isn't freedom of speech for children.
Reply
:iconaristodes:
Aristodes Featured By Owner Jan 18, 2016  Hobbyist Digital Artist
We shouldn't treat adults as children.
Reply
:iconshernod9704:
Shernod9704 Featured By Owner Jan 19, 2016
But it's right for adults to treat children as children?
thats unfair and exploitation.
Reply
Add a Comment:
 
×

:iconaristodes: More from Aristodes


Featured in Collections

Social or Political Related by victauron

Rants and reviews by Guei-Girl

Papers by ShadowofWOPR




Details

Submitted on
November 30, 2015
Link
Thumb

Stats

Views
3,068 (3 today)
Favourites
128 (who?)
Comments
195
×